People with chronic neck pain perform active neck movements in a less variable way

Alsultan, Feras and Cescon, Corrado and De Nunzio, Alessandro and Barbero, Marco and Heneghan, Nicola and Rushton, Alison and Falla, Deborah (2019) People with chronic neck pain perform active neck movements in a less variable way. In: WCPT2019 Proceedings World Confederation for Physical Therapy Congress, 2019, May 10th-13th, Geneva, Switzerland.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official Website:


Background: As well as pain, people with chronic neck pain (CNP) typically present with functional impairments including decreased range of neck motion. While most studies have focused on the quantity of movement, typically measuring static variables during planar cervical motion, knowledge of the quality and variability of movement may provide more detaliled and precise information of movement deficits in people with CNP. Purpose: This study investigated the variability of active neck movement in people with CNP compared to healthy people, using measures of the helical axis (HA) to identify differences in movement variability. Methods: An observational case-control study was conducted in a laboratory setting following ethical approval. The sample comprised asymptomatic (n=18) and CNP (n=18) participants. The CNP group presented with a Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of mean(SD): 12.94(6.84), pain intensity using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 4.08(1.89) Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) of 36.53(6.58). Participants performed 10 repetitions of flexion-extension, bilateral lateral flexion and bilateral rotation movements at different speeds (at a natural self-selected speed, slow speed (30 beats per second (bps)) and fast speed (60 bps)) as cervical kinematic data was recorded using a 3D motion capture system (BTS Bioengineering, Milan,Italy). Mean distance (MD) and mean angle (MA) parameters of the HA were extracted to examine 3Dmotion and movement variability. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate MD and MA between groups, with lower values indicative of less movement variability. Results: A smaller MD during flexion-extension (p=0.019) and rotation movements (p=0.007) was observed in participants with CNP compared to asymptomatic participants. The mean(SD) for the CNP participants at a natural speed was: flexion-extension 1.46cm(0.33) and rotation 0.83cm(0.15), whereas for asymptomatic participants values were 1.61cm(0.28) and 1.07cm(0.33) respectively. No difference between groups was observed for MD measured during lateral flexion (p=0.28). In addition, smaller values of the MA (p< 0.05) were observed in the CNP group during rotation at different speeds.The mean (SD) for the CNP group were as follows: natural speed 4.98°(0.85), slow speed 4.89°(0.71), and fast speed 3.98°(0.42). The asymptomatic group valueswere: natural speed 5.21°(1.04), slow speed 5.44°(1.64), and fast speed 4.99°(1.02). No difference in MA parameters was observed between groups for flexion-extension (p=0.92) or lateral flexion (p=0.21) movements. Conclusion(s): This is the first study to evaluate the variability of active neck movement in people with CNP by utilising parameters of the HA. Decreased movement variability was observed in people with CNP, especially during flexion-extension and rotation movements. These results provide novel insights regarding neck movement behaviour in people with CNP, which may have implications for the persistence of pain. Implications: Examining neck movements using HA parameters can be difficult in typical clinical settings. However, the findings reiterate the importance of data derived from kinematic measures, and its potential for giving clinicians further insight into active neck movement behaviour in people with CNP. Further studies should evaluate movement measures that are simple to collect and use in a clinical setting. These measures have potential for identifying changes in movement quality in people with CNP.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item